Ghost Troop Home Page    April Fools Part 4

 

December 15, Email to George W. Bush

Hey prez.  My dad called yesterday and asked if I had sent you a congratulatory note yet for the capture of Saddam Hussein.  I realized I hadn’t, and wanted to make up for the omission:  Congratulations for catching Saddam, George.  Now you’ve finally accomplished the mission that we went to war for:  getting the guy who tried to get your dad!

You know, I think a lot of your dad myself.  Heck, I volunteered to go to war when he was commander in chief – and even voted for him the one time I voted (Reagan ‘80).  I’m glad as hell that you’ve settled the family grudge, and I’m sure that everyone in the Middle East is sympathetic to you, because they’re a pretty eye-for-an-eye bunch, to hear it from my Jewish and Moslem buddies.  You look pretty good for a change.

Just between us, when did you get hold of the atheist devil?  I was talking with Mike the Moslem yesterday and speculating that Saddam had been in custody for a bit over a week, and that in fact his capture is what set up the declaration of an Iraqi war crimes tribunal and a Baker mission to Europe.  I figure the stuff we saw on TV yesterday was staged, much like the Jessica story, to achieve maximum political effect.

And by the way, it was a good effect.  Whereas I was mad as a hornet over your use of Jessica to distract the public from the American dead in the Battle of Baghdad, I’m pleased as punch that you had Saddam for a week or more before you showed him getting the POW treatment for folks back home.  I hope you got some good drugs into him to get him talking about good stuff, and that you found out plenty in the process.  (Just stay away from the truth serum or you’ll fudge up all the remaining prevarications justifying our incursion into the Middle East!)

I’m glad that yesterday ended the Sunday jinx of bad Iraqi news – like the attempt to whack Wolfwits and my buddy Thom Shanker in Baghdad, or the downed helicopter with 17 killed.  I smiled all four minutes that you addressed the nation and Iraq – because you didn’t gloat at all, or try to pronounce nuclear.  It was a proud day, that’s for sure.

It looks like you’re all ready for the next act of your play, George.  I’ll give you a couple of notes as a Christmas gift, then let you demonstrate your geopolitical genius on the stage of history:  You have achieved personal and symbolic success with the capture of Hussein, but you have not achieved military success.  Keep this in mind and you’ll be on the right course; forget it and you’ll be acting like yourself again.  [Editor’s emphasis, in all cases]

Hussein is no longer a military leader of importance; the anti-American forces are comprised of more factions than even Saddam could name – and many of them are celebrating his fall right along with us.  The leader who unifies the Iraqi resistance groups isn’t Saddam, George, it’s you.  As long as you keep us in Iraq to tell Iraqis how to act, we’ll be attacked.

I hope you have sent Baker to France, Germany, Russia, Italy and England to internationalize the Iraqi situation – I don’t think you’ll get another chance like this.  Clearly, yesterday was the best day for you since Mayday, when you landed on the USS Abe Lincoln in (transitory) glory, and you can’t get another PR moment like that for all the sand in the Sahara (a desert in Africa, Mr. President).

Chase Untermeyer, Mike the Moslem, and a Jewish psychiatrist friend of mine (I’ll send his name and number if you’d like to talk about things) all say you’re ready to do something smart, George.  Ever contrarian (and usually right), I’m saying I sure as hell hope so – but I doubt it.

Captain May sez that Baker is going to Europe to try the hard sell on the Europeans.  You’re going to dress up this news of Saddam’s capture as if it were the gold of victory instead of the mere glimmer of hope, and you’re going to escalate the war through Syria and Lebanon, just like General Weasely Clark has been saying you would.

Believe me, since I started writing analysis of your war (Houston Chronicle, April 3 & July 8) I’ve told a thousand people that I always hope I’ll be wrong about my predictions.  Lord knows, I hope I’m wrong when I say you won’t know what to do with your temporary success.  Just to make sure you have the full benefit of my advice, let me point you in the right way one more time in 2003:

Here are the last two paragraphs of my op-ed “Visions of Stalingrad:  Claim victory in Iraq now”, April 3, 2003, Houston Chronicle Outlook:

“It is important that we share the control of liberated Iraq with a coalition of other nations who are as sincere as we are about protecting its people and its resources.  That would assuage the errant world opinion that we are fighting a war for oil.

“Military intelligence officers are accustomed to being told that their field is a contradiction in terms, and that they are the bearers of bad news and worst-case scenarios.  But it seems to me that fortune is no longer smiling on our heroic liberation of Iraq, and I’m afraid we may learn too late that we have stepped into quicksand.”

I wish you’d read it all in April, George, when I wrote it in your home town press, but better late than never, I suppose.  Merry Christmas.

Captain May

PS:  Please give my best to General Powell.  I like the prostate operation story as an explanation of his sudden absence.  I suppose that with Baker doing the Bush business, a Secretary of State is a bit of a nuisance…

PPS:  Please pass on my sincere best wishes to your dad – I really am glad you got even for him – and would you please download and pass on the attached op-ed, “Success of Desert Storm being judged unfairly.”  I wrote it for the Houston Chronicle, too, back in 1992, just after the first Gulf War.  I don’t know if he saw it, but I took his side in strong terms when he decided that invading Iraq was a bad move.

 

Ghost Troop Home Page    April Fools Part 4